Here I am finally really begin to be popular this blog,
The argument that I want to address today is one of those topics that are discussed from time immemorial and for which will continue to discuss my opinion forever.
Saviano's monologue to "Come away with me" and the tragic news of the death of Maestro Mario Monicelli has reignited the controversy over euthanasia (unfortunately the wrong way, since the day of remembrance of our Master MPs have shown the usual clowns arguing like kindergarten children).
The question is always the same, it is right that a person has the right to decide to end their lives? It 'obvious that if the answer was easy would not have centuries of controversies behind him, and because this blog is intended to give space to the argument, I try to articulate my own, and wait to read yours ....
I think every man should have the right to determine one's life to the fullest until the end, and this includes death, not because life is important and should not be respected, but for its' opposite, because everybody should respect life, but above all their others. To me the point is that, quoting a good movie as Radiofreccia, "I think it is fair to judge the lives of others, however, because you can not know its a shit of life of others." I think anyone can fully understand what may be the reasons why a person arrives at a death wish. To understand them we should have lived the same life, and I think, beyond any political manipulation, or religious journalism being done about this, everyone in the place, maybe not Monicelli, but certainly a number of Piergiorgio Welby, Eluana etc.., wish for death in the same way, not to despise life, but to honor her with a dignified end.
The church continues to condemn euthanasia because it is for God to decide whether to live or to kill a person, but then does not go against this commandment also keep alive a person attached to machines for years? It's not a huge leap of faith to say "Staccatemi the plug, God willing I will continue to live? And then the conversation really is not whether or not it is right to decide for euthanasia, but can reach up to where the concept of life. E 'life remain attached to a machine in terms of a vegetable? I think not, or at least not decent life, is unacceptable because you are no longer the protagonists of their own lives, but mere puppets, helpless and without any power, it is not dignified because in these conditions we can not give happiness to their families, but to a moment of hope that we know perfectly well be in vain, is unacceptable because who does not know you, who do not understand your suffering and your reasons wants decide for you, is unacceptable because you can not freely give up, is unacceptable because even in war, prisoners, before dying last wish was allowed, while in a civil society that says it does not.
deserve great respect for all those who in these conditions continue to struggle and resist, but I think we deserve the same respect those who are tired of struggling, those who for their terminal illness care in going to see peace, confident that that is the last pain caused to family and friends. And the parents deserve respect, those who believe in forever, but perhaps they deserve more than those who ask to switch off, because it takes time, courage, and before you judge you should try to even imagine the pain of a man as the father of Eluana asking to let their daughter die, I personally do not think there can be a pain in the world more terrible, and in front of a pain as this there should be no political speeches, ethical or religious reasons, there should be people for or against, but only a respectful and dignified silence.
0 comments:
Post a Comment